Physique Skool exercise tier list

Lats exercise tier list

42 exact setupsBiomechanics theory ranking · Evidence grade separate
What this ranking claims

Exact setup

We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.

Theory tier

This is a reasoned model, not a laboratory verdict. The tier uses absolute thresholds, not a forced curve.

Evidence grade

D or U shows how much direct support sits behind that judgment. It never raises the tier.

Experience

Personal experience can explain context, but it never adds points.

Complete tier board

Lats: 42 exact setups.

Theory tier and evidence grade answer different questions. Read both before choosing.

Showing 42 of 42 target-specific records.

S tier

Highest-ROI defaults. Strongest mechanics-first starting points for this target.

4
Machine pulloverMachineTheory score94Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 100Practicality 90

Machine pullover is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension4/4
stability4/4
progression4/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost4/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandDumbbell pulloverDumbbell or kettlebellTheory score86Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 100Practicality 77

Dumbbell pullover is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension4/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandIndependent-arm machine pulldownMachineTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Independent-arm machine pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandStraight-Arm Pulldown - CableCableTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Straight-Arm Pulldown - Cable is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

A tier

Excellent options. Strong choices with a modest trade-off or more specific fit.

27
Shared practical bandLat pulldown (pronated grip)Equipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Lat pulldown (pronated grip) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandNeutral-grip lat pulldownEquipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Neutral-grip lat pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandPlate-Loaded Isolateral PulldownMachineTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Plate-Loaded Isolateral Pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandReverse-grip (supinated) lat pulldownEquipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Reverse-grip (supinated) lat pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandStraight-Arm PulldownEquipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Straight-Arm Pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-supported machine high rowMachineTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 79

Chest-supported machine high row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression4/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandHalf-kneeling single-arm cable lat pulldownCableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Half-kneeling single-arm cable lat pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandLow row machine (fixed path, neutral grip)MachineTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 79

Low row machine (fixed path, neutral grip) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression4/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandSingle-arm cable lat pulldown, kneelingCableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Single-arm cable lat pulldown, kneeling is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSingle-Arm Lat PulldownEquipment not specifiedTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Single-Arm Lat Pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandBench-supported one-arm dumbbell lat rowDumbbell or kettlebellTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Bench-supported one-arm dumbbell lat row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-supported independent-arm high rowEquipment not specifiedTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Chest-supported independent-arm high row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandLow-elbow seated cable lat rowCableTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Low-elbow seated cable lat row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSeated Cable RowCableTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Seated Cable Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSeated Cable Row - Neutral GripCableTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Seated Cable Row - Neutral Grip is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSeated cable row, narrow V-handleCableTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Seated cable row, narrow V-handle is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSingle-arm dumbbell row (bench-supported)Dumbbell or kettlebellTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Single-arm dumbbell row (bench-supported) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-Supported RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score74Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 73

Chest-Supported Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-Supported T-Bar RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score74Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 73

Chest-Supported T-Bar Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSeal row (prone chest-supported)Equipment not specifiedTheory score74Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 73

Seal row (prone chest-supported) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandInverted RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Inverted Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandLandmine RowLandmineTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Landmine Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandPlate-Loaded Isolateral RowMachineTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Plate-Loaded Isolateral Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandT-Bar RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

T-Bar Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandCounterweighted machine-assisted pull-upMachineTheory score70Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 67

Counterweighted machine-assisted pull-up is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandSingle-Arm Cable Row - Kneeling Low PulleyCableTheory score70Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 67

Single-Arm Cable Row - Kneeling Low Pulley is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSingle-arm cable row from low pulleyCableTheory score70Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 67

Single-arm cable row from low pulley is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

B tier

Useful options. Valid movements with a higher fatigue cost or less robust mechanics.

7
Shared practical bandBarbell Bent-Over RowBarbellTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Barbell Bent-Over Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChin-up (supinated grip)BodyweightTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Chin-up (supinated grip) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandNeutral-grip pull-upBodyweightTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Neutral-grip pull-up is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandPendlay row (dead-stop bent-over barbell row from floor)BarbellTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Pendlay row (dead-stop bent-over barbell row from floor) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandPull-up (pronated grip)BodyweightTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Pull-up (pronated grip) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandWeighted pull-up or chin-upBodyweightTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Weighted pull-up or chin-up is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandYates row (supinated bent-over barbell row)BarbellTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Yates row (supinated bent-over barbell row) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

C tier

Valid movements. Usually outperformed by easier, more stable defaults.

0

No matches in this tier.

Separate dispositions

Special-use and Held are not lower tiers. They sit outside the S-to-C ladder on purpose.

Special-useNarrow tools kept for a specific role.4
Kneeling lat pulldownEquipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Kneeling lat pulldown is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Suspension / ring rowEquipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Suspension / ring row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Assisted pull-up (machine or band)MachineTheory score70Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 67

Assisted pull-up (machine or band) is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Single-Arm Landmine Rotational RowLandmineTheory score70Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 67

Single-Arm Landmine Rotational Row is ranked for Lats because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder extension or adduction with a lat-directed arm path; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

HeldThe current setup or evidence cannot support a defensible tier.0

No records in this disposition.

How we rank

Exercise selection rubric

Eight questions before one rank.

Every rank starts with a biomechanical model of one muscle and one exact setup. The model traces target demand, resistance profile, stability, progression, and fatigue before assigning a tier.

Physique Skool LawScore the setup, not the exercise name.

  1. Targeting

    01

    Can the exact setup reliably bias the intended muscle instead of a neighboring limiter?

    How directly the setup trains the muscle being ranked.

  2. Productive tension

    02

    Can the target produce meaningful tension through a useful range of motion?

    The quality of load the target receives across the rep.

  3. Stability

    03

    Does the setup provide enough support for effort to reach the target muscle?

    Whether balance and bracing help the lift or steal from it.

  4. Progression

    04

    Can load, reps, range, and execution be progressed and measured consistently?

    How cleanly the exercise supports repeatable overload.

  5. Joint fit

    05

    Can the lifter train hard through tolerable positions without avoidable joint irritation?

    The usable overlap between hard training and joint comfort.

  6. Fatigue cost

    06

    How much non-target fatigue is paid for the local stimulus the exercise creates?

    Local return relative to systemic, axial, grip, and setup fatigue.

  7. Practicality

    07

    Is the equipment, setup, loading, spotting, and transition cost realistic?

    How easy the movement is to perform well in a real program.

  8. Individual fit

    08

    Does the exercise suit the lifter's structure, skill, history, and preferences?

    The personal factors that can override a useful default.

Method

How theory becomes a tier

Theory produces the default rank. Evidence confidence and known context reversals stay visible beside it.

  1. Step 01

    Exact setup

    Compare one precise variation, target, and evidence set before judging the movement.

  2. Step 02

    Biomechanical model

    Trace the target action, line of force, moment demands, muscle length, and resistance profile through the rep.

  3. Step 03

    Context stress test

    Check whether equipment geometry, stability, another limiter, joint fit, or program role reverses the theoretical default.

Separate lens: Program contribution

Coverage, redundancy, time efficiency, and equipment access determine whole-program ROI. They do not change a muscle-specific score.

Separate label: Evidence confidence

Confidence reports how directly the available research supports the judgment. It never becomes bonus points for the exercise itself.