Physique Skool exercise tier list

Rear delts exercise tier list

30 exact setupsBiomechanics theory ranking · Evidence grade separate
What this ranking claims

Exact setup

We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.

Theory tier

This is a reasoned model, not a laboratory verdict. The tier uses absolute thresholds, not a forced curve.

Evidence grade

D or U shows how much direct support sits behind that judgment. It never raises the tier.

Experience

Personal experience can explain context, but it never adds points.

Complete tier board

Rear delts: 30 exact setups.

Theory tier and evidence grade answer different questions. Read both before choosing.

Showing 30 of 30 target-specific records.

S tier

Highest-ROI defaults. Strongest mechanics-first starting points for this target.

9
Shared practical bandBench-supported single-arm cable reverse flyCableTheory score88Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 88

Bench-supported single-arm cable reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability4/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost4/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandLying Single-Arm Reverse FlyEquipment not specifiedTheory score88Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 88

Lying Single-Arm Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability4/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost4/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-Supported Prone Reverse FlyEquipment not specifiedTheory score85Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 83

Chest-Supported Prone Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability4/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost4/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandBent-over dumbbell rear-delt kickback (shoulder extension)Dumbbell or kettlebellTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Bent-over dumbbell rear-delt kickback (shoulder extension) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandBent-over dumbbell reverse flyDumbbell or kettlebellTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Bent-over dumbbell reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandProne Incline Bench Dumbbell Rear Lateral RaiseDumbbell or kettlebellTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Prone Incline Bench Dumbbell Rear Lateral Raise is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandStanding bent-over dumbbell rear-delt flyDumbbell or kettlebellTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Standing bent-over dumbbell rear-delt fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandStanding cable reverse fly (bilateral high-cable crossover)CableTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Standing cable reverse fly (bilateral high-cable crossover) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandStanding dual-cable reverse flyCableTheory score81Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 77

Standing dual-cable reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

A tier

Excellent options. Strong choices with a modest trade-off or more specific fit.

17
Shared practical bandForearm-pad reverse-fly machineMachineTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Forearm-pad reverse-fly machine is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandMachine lateral raise (rear-delt setting)MachineTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Machine lateral raise (rear-delt setting) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandReverse pec deckMachineTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Reverse pec deck is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandRope face pullEquipment not specifiedTheory score79Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 73

Rope face pull is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-supported machine rear-delt rowMachineTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 79

Chest-supported machine rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression4/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandSingle-arm cable rear-delt extensionCableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Single-arm cable rear-delt extension is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSingle-Arm Cable Reverse FlyCableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Single-Arm Cable Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandUnilateral cable lateral raise (rear-delt path)CableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Unilateral cable lateral raise (rear-delt path) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandUnilateral cable rear-delt flyCableTheory score78Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 71

Unilateral cable rear-delt fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability2/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-supported dumbbell rear-delt row (prone incline, high elbows)Dumbbell or kettlebellTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Chest-supported dumbbell rear-delt row (prone incline, high elbows) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandIncline Chest-Supported Single-Arm Rear Delt RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Incline Chest-Supported Single-Arm Rear Delt Row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandSeated cable rear-delt rowCableTheory score76Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 77

Seated cable rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandBanded Standing Face PullBandTheory score75Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 88Practicality 67

Banded Standing Face Pull is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is band-specific resistance and load measurement.

targeting4/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandChest-supported rear-delt rowEquipment not specifiedTheory score74Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 73

Chest-supported rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandPlate-loaded lever rear-delt row (chest-supported, e.g., Hammer Strength iso-lateral)MachineTheory score74Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 73

Plate-loaded lever rear-delt row (chest-supported, e.g., Hammer Strength iso-lateral) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.

Shared practical bandBent-Over Wide-Grip Rear Delt RowEquipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Bent-Over Wide-Grip Rear Delt Row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Shared practical bandElbows-out inverted rowEquipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Elbows-out inverted row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

B tier

Useful options. Valid movements with a higher fatigue cost or less robust mechanics.

1
Unilateral dumbbell rear-delt row (elbow-high, torso-supported)Dumbbell or kettlebellTheory score66Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 60

Unilateral dumbbell rear-delt row (elbow-high, torso-supported) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability1/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit4/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

C tier

Valid movements. Usually outperformed by easier, more stable defaults.

0

No matches in this tier.

Separate dispositions

Special-use and Held are not lower tiers. They sit outside the S-to-C ladder on purpose.

Special-useNarrow tools kept for a specific role.3
Wide-Grip Inverted Row (Rear-Delt Emphasis)Equipment not specifiedTheory score71Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 69

Wide-Grip Inverted Row (Rear-Delt Emphasis) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression3/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Bodyweight Inverted Row with High-Elbow FlareBodyweightTheory score68Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 75Practicality 63

Bodyweight Inverted Row with High-Elbow Flare is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.

targeting3/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost2/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.

Band Pull-ApartBandTheory score65Evidence gradeD
Evidence D · Mechanics-led evidenceStimulus 63Practicality 67

Band Pull-Apart is ranked for Rear delts because it can contribute to loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension, but the target share is more setup-dependent; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is band-specific resistance and load measurement.

targeting2/4
productive Tension3/4
stability3/4
progression2/4
joint Fit3/4
fatigue Cost3/4
practicality3/4
individual Fit2/4

What would change it: Change the placement if exact setup geometry establishes a direct target moment and repeatable loading, or if the competing limiter proves dominant.

HeldThe current setup or evidence cannot support a defensible tier.0

No records in this disposition.

How we rank

Exercise selection rubric

Eight questions before one rank.

Every rank starts with a biomechanical model of one muscle and one exact setup. The model traces target demand, resistance profile, stability, progression, and fatigue before assigning a tier.

Physique Skool LawScore the setup, not the exercise name.

  1. Targeting

    01

    Can the exact setup reliably bias the intended muscle instead of a neighboring limiter?

    How directly the setup trains the muscle being ranked.

  2. Productive tension

    02

    Can the target produce meaningful tension through a useful range of motion?

    The quality of load the target receives across the rep.

  3. Stability

    03

    Does the setup provide enough support for effort to reach the target muscle?

    Whether balance and bracing help the lift or steal from it.

  4. Progression

    04

    Can load, reps, range, and execution be progressed and measured consistently?

    How cleanly the exercise supports repeatable overload.

  5. Joint fit

    05

    Can the lifter train hard through tolerable positions without avoidable joint irritation?

    The usable overlap between hard training and joint comfort.

  6. Fatigue cost

    06

    How much non-target fatigue is paid for the local stimulus the exercise creates?

    Local return relative to systemic, axial, grip, and setup fatigue.

  7. Practicality

    07

    Is the equipment, setup, loading, spotting, and transition cost realistic?

    How easy the movement is to perform well in a real program.

  8. Individual fit

    08

    Does the exercise suit the lifter's structure, skill, history, and preferences?

    The personal factors that can override a useful default.

Method

How theory becomes a tier

Theory produces the default rank. Evidence confidence and known context reversals stay visible beside it.

  1. Step 01

    Exact setup

    Compare one precise variation, target, and evidence set before judging the movement.

  2. Step 02

    Biomechanical model

    Trace the target action, line of force, moment demands, muscle length, and resistance profile through the rep.

  3. Step 03

    Context stress test

    Check whether equipment geometry, stability, another limiter, joint fit, or program role reverses the theoretical default.

Separate lens: Program contribution

Coverage, redundancy, time efficiency, and equipment access determine whole-program ROI. They do not change a muscle-specific score.

Separate label: Evidence confidence

Confidence reports how directly the available research supports the judgment. It never becomes bonus points for the exercise itself.