Exact setup
We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.
Physique Skool exercise tier list
We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.
This is a reasoned model, not a laboratory verdict. The tier uses absolute thresholds, not a forced curve.
D or U shows how much direct support sits behind that judgment. It never raises the tier.
Personal experience can explain context, but it never adds points.
Complete tier board
Theory tier and evidence grade answer different questions. Read both before choosing.
Showing 30 of 30 target-specific records.
Highest-ROI defaults. Strongest mechanics-first starting points for this target.
Bench-supported single-arm cable reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Lying Single-Arm Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Chest-Supported Prone Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Bent-over dumbbell rear-delt kickback (shoulder extension) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Bent-over dumbbell reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Prone Incline Bench Dumbbell Rear Lateral Raise is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing bent-over dumbbell rear-delt fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing cable reverse fly (bilateral high-cable crossover) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing dual-cable reverse fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Excellent options. Strong choices with a modest trade-off or more specific fit.
Forearm-pad reverse-fly machine is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Machine lateral raise (rear-delt setting) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Reverse pec deck is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Rope face pull is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Chest-supported machine rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Single-arm cable rear-delt extension is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Single-Arm Cable Reverse Fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Unilateral cable lateral raise (rear-delt path) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Unilateral cable rear-delt fly is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Chest-supported dumbbell rear-delt row (prone incline, high elbows) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Incline Chest-Supported Single-Arm Rear Delt Row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Seated cable rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Banded Standing Face Pull is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is band-specific resistance and load measurement.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Chest-supported rear-delt row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Plate-loaded lever rear-delt row (chest-supported, e.g., Hammer Strength iso-lateral) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Bent-Over Wide-Grip Rear Delt Row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Elbows-out inverted row is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Useful options. Valid movements with a higher fatigue cost or less robust mechanics.
Unilateral dumbbell rear-delt row (elbow-high, torso-supported) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Valid movements. Usually outperformed by easier, more stable defaults.
No matches in this tier.
Special-use and Held are not lower tiers. They sit outside the S-to-C ladder on purpose.
Wide-Grip Inverted Row (Rear-Delt Emphasis) is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Bodyweight Inverted Row with High-Elbow Flare is ranked for Rear delts because its named path directly expresses loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Band Pull-Apart is ranked for Rear delts because it can contribute to loaded shoulder horizontal abduction or rear-delt-directed extension, but the target share is more setup-dependent; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is band-specific resistance and load measurement.
What would change it: Change the placement if exact setup geometry establishes a direct target moment and repeatable loading, or if the competing limiter proves dominant.
No records in this disposition.
Exercise selection rubric
Every rank starts with a biomechanical model of one muscle and one exact setup. The model traces target demand, resistance profile, stability, progression, and fatigue before assigning a tier.
Physique Skool LawScore the setup, not the exercise name.
Can the exact setup reliably bias the intended muscle instead of a neighboring limiter?
How directly the setup trains the muscle being ranked.
Can the target produce meaningful tension through a useful range of motion?
The quality of load the target receives across the rep.
Does the setup provide enough support for effort to reach the target muscle?
Whether balance and bracing help the lift or steal from it.
Can load, reps, range, and execution be progressed and measured consistently?
How cleanly the exercise supports repeatable overload.
Can the lifter train hard through tolerable positions without avoidable joint irritation?
The usable overlap between hard training and joint comfort.
How much non-target fatigue is paid for the local stimulus the exercise creates?
Local return relative to systemic, axial, grip, and setup fatigue.
Is the equipment, setup, loading, spotting, and transition cost realistic?
How easy the movement is to perform well in a real program.
Does the exercise suit the lifter's structure, skill, history, and preferences?
The personal factors that can override a useful default.
Method
Theory produces the default rank. Evidence confidence and known context reversals stay visible beside it.
Step 01
Compare one precise variation, target, and evidence set before judging the movement.
Step 02
Trace the target action, line of force, moment demands, muscle length, and resistance profile through the rep.
Step 03
Check whether equipment geometry, stability, another limiter, joint fit, or program role reverses the theoretical default.
Separate lens: Program contribution
Coverage, redundancy, time efficiency, and equipment access determine whole-program ROI. They do not change a muscle-specific score.
Separate label: Evidence confidence
Confidence reports how directly the available research supports the judgment. It never becomes bonus points for the exercise itself.