Exact setup
We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.
Physique Skool exercise tier list
We score one defined setup, not an exercise name in the abstract.
This is a reasoned model, not a laboratory verdict. The tier uses absolute thresholds, not a forced curve.
D or U shows how much direct support sits behind that judgment. It never raises the tier.
Personal experience can explain context, but it never adds points.
Complete tier board
Theory tier and evidence grade answer different questions. Read both before choosing.
Showing 55 of 55 target-specific records.
Highest-ROI defaults. Strongest mechanics-first starting points for this target.
Seated Machine Trunk Rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Seated Plate-Loaded Trunk Rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Smith Machine Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Torso Twist Machine is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Cable Seated Twist is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Seated cable twist is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Russian Twist (Seated) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
45-Degree Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable chop (high-to-low) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable lift (low-to-high) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable Side Bend (Kneeling) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable Standing Twisting Crunch is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Cable Woodchop (Low-to-High) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Dumbbell Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Half-kneeling cable rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Half-Kneeling Cable Woodchop is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
High-to-Low Cable Woodchop is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Kneeling cable crunch with rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Low-to-High Cable Lift is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Low-to-High Cable Woodchop is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Offset March (Kettlebell/Dumbbell) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing Cable Rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing Cable Trunk Rotation (Woodchop) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Excellent options. Strong choices with a modest trade-off or more specific fit.
Captain's chair oblique knee raise is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Decline Bench Oblique Crunch is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Decline Twisting Crunch is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Decline weighted twisting sit-up is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Hanging Oblique Knee Raise is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Hanging Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Hanging windshield wiper is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Kettlebell Windmill is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Landmine 180 is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Landmine Rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Landmine Rotation (Half-Kneeling) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Roman Chair Hyperextension Side Bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Saxon side bend is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Seated rotary torso machine is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is fit to the exact machine path.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Side Crunch on Stability Ball is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Side-Lying Oblique Crunch is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; external support reduces balance and bracing demands. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Twisting Hanging Leg Raise is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing Band Rotation is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is band-specific resistance and load measurement.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Useful options. Valid movements with a higher fatigue cost or less robust mechanics.
Bicycle crunch is ranked for Obliques because it can contribute to loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation, but the target share is more setup-dependent; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Change the placement if exact setup geometry establishes a direct target moment and repeatable loading, or if the competing limiter proves dominant.
Copenhagen Plank (Long Lever) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Copenhagen Plank (Short Lever) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Change the placement if the exact machine geometry removes target torque, restricts usable range, or creates a common joint-fit reversal.
Valid movements. Usually outperformed by easier, more stable defaults.
Side Plank Band Row is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Side Plank Hip Dip is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Weighted Side-Plank Hip Lift is ranked for Obliques because it can contribute to loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation, but the target share is more setup-dependent; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Change the placement if exact setup geometry establishes a direct target moment and repeatable loading, or if the competing limiter proves dominant.
Special-use and Held are not lower tiers. They sit outside the S-to-C ladder on purpose.
Half-kneeling Pallof press is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Standing Pallof press is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Ab Wheel Oblique Rollout (Angled) is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Suitcase Carry is ranked for Obliques because it can contribute to loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation, but the target share is more setup-dependent; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is individual joint fit and execution consistency.
What would change it: Change the placement if exact setup geometry establishes a direct target moment and repeatable loading, or if the competing limiter proves dominant.
Copenhagen adductor plank is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Side Plank is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the multi-joint setup trades some local specificity for loading capacity. The main limitation is range-specific loading and progression.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
Medicine ball rotational throw is ranked for Obliques because its named path directly expresses loaded rotation, lateral flexion, or anti-rotation; the relatively isolated task limits competing systemic fatigue. The main limitation is skill, momentum, and non-target fatigue.
What would change it: Reverse or lower the placement if a corrected line-of-force model shows that another limiter owns the task, or if the declared range cannot be progressed repeatably.
No records in this disposition.
Exercise selection rubric
Every rank starts with a biomechanical model of one muscle and one exact setup. The model traces target demand, resistance profile, stability, progression, and fatigue before assigning a tier.
Physique Skool LawScore the setup, not the exercise name.
Can the exact setup reliably bias the intended muscle instead of a neighboring limiter?
How directly the setup trains the muscle being ranked.
Can the target produce meaningful tension through a useful range of motion?
The quality of load the target receives across the rep.
Does the setup provide enough support for effort to reach the target muscle?
Whether balance and bracing help the lift or steal from it.
Can load, reps, range, and execution be progressed and measured consistently?
How cleanly the exercise supports repeatable overload.
Can the lifter train hard through tolerable positions without avoidable joint irritation?
The usable overlap between hard training and joint comfort.
How much non-target fatigue is paid for the local stimulus the exercise creates?
Local return relative to systemic, axial, grip, and setup fatigue.
Is the equipment, setup, loading, spotting, and transition cost realistic?
How easy the movement is to perform well in a real program.
Does the exercise suit the lifter's structure, skill, history, and preferences?
The personal factors that can override a useful default.
Method
Theory produces the default rank. Evidence confidence and known context reversals stay visible beside it.
Step 01
Compare one precise variation, target, and evidence set before judging the movement.
Step 02
Trace the target action, line of force, moment demands, muscle length, and resistance profile through the rep.
Step 03
Check whether equipment geometry, stability, another limiter, joint fit, or program role reverses the theoretical default.
Separate lens: Program contribution
Coverage, redundancy, time efficiency, and equipment access determine whole-program ROI. They do not change a muscle-specific score.
Separate label: Evidence confidence
Confidence reports how directly the available research supports the judgment. It never becomes bonus points for the exercise itself.